The World's Greatest Books — Volume 13 — Religion and Philosophy — Background and Themes
Edition facts
The World's Greatest Books — Volume 13 — Religion and Philosophy — Background and Themes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 118,199 words, 8 hr 34 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 22.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Religion,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergThe editors of this volume, Arthur Mee and J. A. Hammerton, faced a formidable task: condensing works such as Augustine's City of God, Pascal's Letters to a Provincial, and Newman's Apologia pro Vita Sua into compact, accessible entries. Their method is visible from the first page: each entry opens with a brief historical or doctrinal context, then presents a series of excerpts linked by editorial summaries. The result is less a anthology of primary sources than a guided tour, where the editors' choices of what to include—and what to omit—shape the reader's encounter with each thinker.
Editorial Framing and Historical Context
The entry on the Apocrypha exemplifies the editors' approach. They begin by defining the term and tracing its contested status from the Septuagint to the Council of Trent and the Westminster Confession. This framing is not neutral: by recounting the 1825–1827 controversy that led to the Apocrypha's deletion from Bibles issued by the British and Foreign Bible Society, the editors highlight the political and theological stakes. They also include a telling detail—the quotation from the Wisdom of Solomon engraved on the Prince Consort's Memorial—which demonstrates how these texts continued to surface in public life despite official exclusion. The editorial voice here is informative but pointed, guiding the reader to see the Apocrypha as a site of enduring conflict rather than a settled category.
Selective Quotation and Rhetorical Effect
In the excerpt from Newman's Apologia, the editors preserve his distinctive first-person voice—'I was in great perplexity, and hardly knew where I stood'—while omitting much of the surrounding argument. This choice foregrounds Newman's emotional and spiritual turmoil over his theological reasoning. Similarly, they retain his striking formulation: 'ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt.' By isolating such memorable lines, the editors create a portrait of Newman as a figure of intense personal conviction, even as they strip away the dense patristic and historical arguments that fill his original text. The effect is to make Newman's journey toward Catholicism seem driven by existential urgency rather than scholarly debate.
Condensation and the Loss of Complexity
The editors' condensation inevitably flattens nuance. In Newman's section, they jump from his resignation of St. Mary's living in September 1843 to his resolution to be received into the Catholic Church in October 1845, compressing two years of intellectual labor into a single paragraph. The 'Essay on the Development of Doctrine' is mentioned only as a prelude to his conversion, not as a work of theology in its own right. Similarly, the entry on the Apocrypha reduces centuries of debate to a few paragraphs, omitting the textual and historical scholarship that underpins modern understanding. Readers should be aware that these summaries are starting points, not substitutes for the originals.
The Editors' Implicit Theology
Throughout the volume, the editors' own commitments surface in their word choices. In the Apocrypha entry, they describe the books as 'not regarded as genuine Scripture' by 'theological or bibliographic purists,' a phrase that subtly distances them from that position. They also note that the books 'bear evidence of having been written long after the date to which they are ascribed,' a critical stance that aligns with modern scholarship. In Newman's entry, they include his assertion that 'there was no medium, in true philosophy, between atheism and Catholicity,' without comment, allowing his radical claim to stand unchallenged. These editorial decisions create a text that is neither purely descriptive nor purely neutral, but shaped by a particular perspective on religious authority and historical criticism.
Readers approaching this volume should treat each entry as an editorial interpretation rather than a transparent window onto the original work. The selections and summaries reflect the editors' judgments about what is essential and what can be set aside. For those unfamiliar with these texts, the volume offers a useful orientation; for those who know them well, it provides a fascinating case study in how canonical works are repackaged for a general audience. The best use of this book is as a companion, not a replacement, for the full works it introduces.
Reading those carefully shaped excerpts reminded me how the editors' quiet choices can echo long after you put the page down. It felt like overhearing a thoughtful conversation where every pause matters. That same patient, wondering spirit lingers in Philosophy and Religion Six Lectures Delivered at Cambridge — Background and Themes, almost like a gentle echo, asking me to sit with it a while longer.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.